From Integrity Policing to Alignment Building
- Justine Jones
- Sep 24
- 2 min read

Estimated read time: 5 minutes
When Integrity Gets Reduced to Policing
Every leader says they value integrity. But too often, organizations reduce integrity to compliance, lists of rules, formal investigations, and punishments for missteps. Leaders become “integrity police,” monitoring behavior with the goal of catching violations.
The problem? Policing doesn’t inspire trust. It breeds fear. When people feel like they’re being watched for mistakes, they don’t bring their best ideas forward. They cover up problems, avoid risk, and focus on survival instead of contribution.
Integrity is non-negotiable. But policing is the weakest way to achieve it.
Why Alignment Builds More Than Enforcement
True leadership is about alignment: creating clarity so that people understand the values, decisions, and standards the organization actually lives by. When people are aligned, they don’t need to be policed; they choose to act in ways that reinforce trust and credibility.
Alignment creates:
Shared clarity. Everyone knows what “doing the right thing” looks like in practice.
Consistent modeling. Leaders don’t just say values, they live them.
Self-correction. Teams spot when they drift off course and adjust without needing constant oversight.
Policing relies on rules and consequences. Alignment relies on shared ownership.
What Policing Looks Like vs. What Alignment Looks Like
Policing: Writing a 10-page policy about ethics, then disciplining violators.
Alignment: Talking openly about real-world dilemmas and how values guide choices.
Policing: Waiting until misconduct surfaces, then launching an investigation.
Alignment: Addressing small cracks early; normalizing accountability conversations before they become scandals.
Policing: Leaders exempt themselves while demanding compliance from others.
Alignment: Leaders model the very standards they expect, visibly and consistently.
One approach creates fear. The other creates culture.
The Shift Leaders Need to Make
Moving from policing to alignment isn’t about being “softer.” It’s about being more effective. That shift requires courage and consistency:
From catching mistakes → to coaching choices. Instead of waiting for failure, leaders teach teams how to navigate gray areas before problems arise.
From policy manuals → to daily habits. Culture doesn’t grow from binders on shelves. It grows from small, everyday decisions made the same way over and over again.
From compliance to commitment. Compliance keeps people in line. Commitment inspires them to go further than required.
What Leaders Can Do Differently This Week
Audit your time. Are you spending more hours enforcing or coaching? Your calendar tells the truth.
Model openly. Share a recent decision where values guided your choice. People learn faster from example than from policy.
Reframe accountability. Instead of “you broke a rule,” ask, “Where did our alignment slip, and how do we reset it?”
These small changes compound. They teach teams that integrity isn’t a trap waiting to catch them; it’s a standard they’re trusted to uphold.
The Takeaway
Integrity enforced through policing may prevent the worst behaviors, but it will never produce the best ones. Alignment, on the other hand, gives people a compass they can use when no one is watching. It shifts integrity from a fear-driven minimum to a culture-wide standard.
Leaders who want trust that lasts don’t settle for policing. They build alignment. And over time, that alignment turns into the most powerful form of integrity: the kind people choose for themselves.
Comments